The controls
Six answers to the two real questions.
Buyers worry about two distinct things: that AI will be trained on their content, and that their content could leak. They are different problems, and they get different answers.
No trainingNever used to train a model
Production runs on enterprise AI, not the consumer tools that learn from what people type. The strictest no-training terms are activated before any confidential material is uploaded. Your content builds your academy and nothing else.
IsolationWalled off, and verified
Your material and learners sit in your own tenant, enforced at the database. Isolation is continuously checked by an automated security suite, and a routine audit that found cross-tenant gaps had them closed and re-verified. Checked, not asserted.
MediatedNo open pipe to a chatbot
Every AI action runs through the platform and its validation gate. There is no raw model to converse with that could carry one client's material into another's course. The AI is an ingredient, never an exposed endpoint.
MinimisedThe less we keep, the less can leak
The design goal at ingest is to keep as little of your raw source as possible: use it to produce the course, then hold your finished content rather than the confidential originals. Fewer copies, shorter-lived, is the leak answer.
Your IPYours to keep, and to take
You own the academy you build. Export it, in standard formats, and take it with you. Leaving does not strand your content, and we do not hold your library hostage to a renewal.
On paperDocumented, not just promised
A data-processing agreement you can sign, a named sub-processor register, and a data flow you can walk your security team through. The kind of thing a vendor risk assessment actually asks for.